The Perspectives Series Vol 4: In Conversation with Michael Twitty
Reclaiming Black Culinary Traditions and their Rightful Place as the Foundation of Modern America (Excerpt).
Originally published on September 3rd, 2020.
The following is an excerpt from the conversation between Michael Twitty and Will Dorman, the full version has been published in Issue #4 of the Preserve Journal. (S'ouvre dans une nouvelle fenĂȘtre)
Michael W. Twitty (S'ouvre dans une nouvelle fenĂȘtre) is the author of the blog Afroculinaria (S'ouvre dans une nouvelle fenĂȘtre), a food writer, independent scholar, culinary historian and historical interpreter personally charged with preparing, preserving and promoting African American foodways and its parent traditions in Africa and her Diaspora and its legacy in the food culture of the American South. Michael is a Judaic studies teacher from the Washington D.C. Metropolitan area and his interests include food culture, food history, Jewish cultural issues, African American history and cultural politics.
Will Dorman (S'ouvre dans une nouvelle fenĂȘtre)is a chef, butcher, writer, and historian currently living and working in London. His areas of interest include regenerative agriculture, fermentation, food sovereignty, and intersectional climate justice. Currently, Will is working as a butcher at a Pasture for Life Association, a whole carcass animal butchery exclusively sourcing animals raised through regenerative land management practices.
 Will Dorman (WD): How do you interpret the cultural exchange that occurred as a result of chattel slavery? How does that inform our society today?
Michael W. Twitty (MT): We understand that certain dishes, practices and ideas didnât exist prior to our ancestors being engaged with the outside world through exile. Enslaved Africans brought their seeds, traditions, and folk knowledge with them. Itâs so many of these ingredients and food ways which contributed to or formed the basis for most of the dishes we call Southern food. All of this was despite the hardships they endured. They made a way out of no way. Unfortunately, their thought process has never really been investigatedâŠ
The fact is that Iâm the one who has to spend thousands of dollars to find out where I come from. Other people can go look themselves up on ancestry.com no problem. Thatâs a lot of hard work and money from people who were denied a lot of money from their hard work. Only we have to do that. And itâs not just the money and the time- itâs the emotion. The feeling for me was, âOh my god, these people had names! Oh my god that was my familyâs name? Oh my god, we came from where? Oh my god, that person looks like my aunt, grandpa, grandma or me.â And I would never have known this had I not done the work. Thatâs part of the scholarship unfortunately. Nobody talks about that. {âŠ}. I remember when I got really slammed by the guy who was writing in Charleston, who called me a Nazi because of the DNA research. He was trying to say âweâre all related anyway.â And I thought- the arrogance!
Â
WD: Saying that is no different than when people say âall lives matterâ.
MT: Itâs all lives matter, yes. Because he wasnât talking about the whole globe- he was talking about Europeans and didnât even realize. Yes, I am related to a lot of Europeans, but how am I related to them? Oooooooh⊠See what happens the moment you ask that question? And the thing is that if youâre using Europeans as the basis to make an argument that Michael Twitty is full of nonsense because weâre all related anyway then youâre talking about Europeans who lived on the European continent. Most of them didnât move 30-50 miles from the place they were born in their lifetime. From these ethnic and national identities in very small spaces youâre repeating eurocentrism by arguing that my arguments for diversity and inclusion of black history are bunk by saying âletâs go back to what we knowâ well, âwho is we?â And what do we know about ourselves?
That way of thinking totally denies the fact that there are African genes and African backgrounds in many white southerners. White southerners are some of the blackest white people in North America. 10-15% carry enough genes, that if we imposed the one drop rule thereâs be a lot more official black people running around. Those that donât have that genealogy have still grown up around us and lived around us and absorbed our culture for so long that if you took them to their fatherlands, England, France, Scotland, Ireland, Denmark and then took them to Nigeria, I promise you theyâd feel more at home and more comfortable in Nigeria. That would scare the hell out of them because it would fly in the face of everything theyâve been taught about who they are, what they are, and where they come form. Thatâs the part of the work which is confrontational. Iâm not trying to be a jerk. Iâm just trying to show you a mirror. The mirror is a very powerful thing my friend.
Most white Americans do not look at the mirror and see some outside force staring back at them. Many, but not all, Black Americans do. Every time I look in the mirror I see straight hair coming out of my face. That didnât come from West Africa. Iâm 20% European. If you were to add up my DNA I would have one white grandparent. Thatâs all part of how we define race.
Race is an illusion; food is a reality. However, racism is not an illusion; racism is a pathology. Itâs something that we have to deal with and interact with- a social illness, a disease. We have to deal with it and we have to figure out a way out of it. Everyday you get up and do the work by getting up and looking in the mirror. You have to see this person that is shaped by several hundred years of history. You can ignore it, and thatâs fine. Youâre okay to ignore it because no one is forcing you to deal with the complexity of how you got here. Sometimes for your own personal mental health, itâs not a road you should go down. However, if you want to go down that road, you have to tell the truth. More and more people are not confrontational about this, but Iâm not going to kid myself, and Iâm not going to kid you either. These changes in perception didnât happen because theyâre natural. Theyâve happened because me and a lot of other people forced that conversation for a very long time.
WD: Thatâs such an important point. So much of the change weâre seeing now is the result of grassroots organizing and people like you telling the truth about the Black experience in America even when there has been so much pushback and confrontation.
WD: You mentioned that race is an illusion, food is a reality. How does this relate to the purpose of the work youâre doing?
MT: I donât like when people say, âoh it doesnât matter what race you areâ or even right now during the current situation they talk about, âracial disparities.â You know this isnât a thing right? Weâve already had this conversation but people cling to that language. Race is really what weâd call genotype, phenotype, ethnotype and sociotype. Those four parts. What I like to do is use my manner of inquiry and say âyouâre saying race but what you really mean is socio-cultural and economic statusâ. What you really mean when you say that is the social status someone is given that makes them either adorable or ugly, smart or dumb, talented or not based on social myths and perceptions i.e. stereotypes. Another misconception is that race is your color. Your color is your phenotype- it is how you look. Itâs the gamble of genes that makes you look a certain way. Ethnotype is what we make of it. Ethnicities are born every minute and we donât even realize it. New social understandings in groupings arise and then they die out too. Take that back to food and black people. Itâs not just us, itâs the people of Colombia, itâs the people of the Pacific coast, the Atlantic coast, the Venezuelans, and the Bahamians, and the people in the north of the Amazon. Itâs hundreds of stories that the simplistic word âraceâ cannot encapsulate. We need to start seeing people as ethnic and unique.
When I really started to do this work I had a lot of ambivalence about being African American and what it meant to be African American because I was consistently told that we werenât really nice people, werenât good people, and that if we were accomplished, our accomplishment was impressing white people as opposed to just being ourselves. Then as a result of this project I discovered that we had a massive hand in freeing ourselves, did stuff on our own terms, and brought this culture over and had to work out for ourselves passing that culture down. I think if thereâs any exceptionalism in America itâs the Black woman and the Black man- despite the odds.
You and I both know that everybody comes from slaves. Everybody has ancestors that were enslaved- that wore the shoe of the servant and of the oppressed at one point or another. But how is it that the enslaved Africans, when all that was taken from them, still managed to transform the culture for the people around them?
Â
WD: You talk a lot about the idea of culinary injustice. How would you define it? How is culinary justice related to environmentalism and climate change?
MT: Culinary injustice is the act of denying people ownership and agency over their culinary productions and industry. I say thatâs different from food justice. Food justice circles around food as a human right, particularly food thatâs nutritious and sustaining and enables positive growth in humankind and human communities. Cuisine is a part of culture. Itâs intellectual and cultural property. A lot of times we forget that part of the selling of culinary culture is based on who has the mouthpiece. Who is marketing? Part of selling food is selling a story, selling a narrative, and itâs bound up with access to land, who grows the food, and who gets to label the histories behind the foodâŠ
The word whitewashing is too clichĂ©- itâs a constant erasure. How does that trickle down? People will say âyou black kids, youâre lazy, you donât wanna go to workâ, âyâall donât wanna do nothinâ. First of all, in order to be in the food game you have to have property, land, access to places you can grow food, and clean water. Then all the environmental stuff you talked about before is down the tube- because when you live in Cancer Alley and food deserts itâs hard. Itâs not easy to reclaim your culinary heritage- whatever it is. Then you tell our kids theyâre lazy, they donât want to do anything. If they would only get good grades and become Obama then we could ridicule you on the national stage. You canât win. Then awful people say things like âhalf-rican Americanâ and qualify your blackness as a joke in front of the world. Itâs gross.
Letâs go back- you tell my kids that they donât have any heritage and they donât have any land. Well, the landâs been taken away, stripped down from black people in this country to almost nothing whereas one hundred years ago we had a ton of land despite having to earn it. They put in twice the work, the kind of work that European settlers coming into the Midwest never had to do. We had this culture, this intense beautiful interaction where we were either the inventors, the creators, or the go-betweens who catalyzed mixing cultures. We get no credit for it. Weâre locked out the story and the value that the cache of that story gives you. You know why people love New Orleansâ food? Because they taste Africa, but they hear France. Theyâve always been told that New Orleans was this cultural capsule of French culture with absolutely no understanding of what fucking French food is aboutâŠ.
I get very upset when people write me letters like this woman who said âyouâre trying to erase me as a white southerner.â Iâm not trying to erase you - Iâm trying to show you your African ancestors!